<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The tuning test on The Broken-Born program</title><link>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/</link><description>Recent content in The tuning test on The Broken-Born program</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The misalignment potential</title><link>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/misalignment-potential/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/misalignment-potential/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The misalignment potential is the energy cost that the program assigns to a mismatch between the &lt;a href="/wiki/symmetry-breaking/order-parameter/"&gt;polarization J&lt;/a&gt;, the split of phase space into position and momentum directions that the vacuum has chosen, and the local phase-space geometry, which the &lt;a href="/wiki/phase-space/modular-field/modular-field-z/"&gt;modular field&lt;/a&gt; Z carries. The &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/momentum-graviton/"&gt;momentum graviton X&lt;/a&gt;, the real part of Z, gets no potential from the geometry alone, because constant shifts of X are a symmetry (&lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/momentum-graviton/shift-symmetry/"&gt;the shift symmetry&lt;/a&gt;), so its mass has to come from this term. The &lt;a href="/wiki/history/documents/debt-1-notes/"&gt;calc notes&lt;/a&gt; call it the η-selection, or Higgs, sector. The natural measure of the mismatch is the anticommutator {J, I[Z]} of the polarization with the &lt;a href="/wiki/phase-space/born-geometry/born-structures/"&gt;complex structure&lt;/a&gt; built from Z, which is zero when the two are compatible; its block form is derived exactly and checked by machine. Calc note #7 reads off the blocks that the mismatch vanishes only at X = 0 with the metric pinned to a reference metric (see flag 3 in &lt;code&gt;review/wiki-build-flags.md&lt;/code&gt;), so that the potential involves two tensors, as the potentials of &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/drgt-massive-gravity/"&gt;massive gravity&lt;/a&gt; do. Whether such a potential avoids the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/fierz-pauli/"&gt;Boulware–Deser ghost&lt;/a&gt; is the question of &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/"&gt;the tuning test&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The metric tier fails twice</title><link>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/metric-tier-failures/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/metric-tier-failures/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The metric tier is the naive way, in &lt;a href="/wiki/history/documents/debt-1-notes/"&gt;calc note #7&lt;/a&gt;&amp;rsquo;s word, of writing the mass term of the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/momentum-graviton/"&gt;momentum graviton X&lt;/a&gt;: as a function of metric-level, second-order quantities, the blocks of the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/misalignment-potential/"&gt;misalignment potential&lt;/a&gt;. It fails the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/ghosts/#how-ghost-freedom-is-checked-t"&gt;ghost-freedom&lt;/a&gt; test in two independent ways. At quadratic order the natural potential gives the metric fluctuation h a mass term proportional to Tr(h²) without the −(Tr h)² term that the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/fierz-pauli/"&gt;Fierz–Pauli&lt;/a&gt; form requires. Beyond quadratic order it contains Tr(g²), which is not a linear combination of the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/elementary-symmetric-polynomials/"&gt;elementary symmetric polynomials&lt;/a&gt; from which every ghost-free &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/hassan-rosen-bimetric/"&gt;Hassan–Rosen&lt;/a&gt; potential is built. Either failure lets the Boulware–Deser ghost, an extra mode with negative kinetic energy, propagate [T]. Calc note #7 calls the result a &amp;ldquo;theorem-grade negative&amp;rdquo;, and tests T4 and T7 of &lt;a href="/wiki/method/verification/battery/"&gt;the verification battery&lt;/a&gt; check both failures by machine. The way out was a change of variables, to &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/frame-tier/"&gt;the frame tier&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The frame tier: the symplectic vielbein</title><link>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/frame-tier/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/frame-tier/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The frame tier is the reformulation that rescued &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/"&gt;the tuning test&lt;/a&gt;: the mass term of the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/momentum-graviton/"&gt;momentum graviton X&lt;/a&gt; is built from frames, or vielbeins, instead of from metrics. A frame is a set of local reference axes from which a metric is assembled quadratically, as H = EᵀE, so the program calls frames first-order variables and metrics second-order ones. In frame variables the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/ghosts/"&gt;ghost-free&lt;/a&gt; potentials for two spin-2 fields are plain polynomials, wedge products of the two frames in the form found by Hinterbichler and Rosen (&lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/vielbein-formulation/"&gt;the vielbein formulation&lt;/a&gt;), with no matrix square roots and no ratio of coefficients to get wrong. The program has a frame of this kind, the symplectic vielbein E, which sits on the same first-order footing as the &lt;a href="/wiki/symmetry-breaking/order-parameter/"&gt;polarization J&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="/wiki/history/documents/debt-1-notes/"&gt;Calc note #7&lt;/a&gt; argues that the minimal coupling of the polarization to the geometry is therefore a wedge polynomial of E and a polarization frame E₀[J], and such a polynomial lies in the ghost-free class by construction, with the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/fierz-pauli/"&gt;Fierz–Pauli&lt;/a&gt; structure automatic. The argument is structural and rests on the literature. The class was selected by minimality and consistency rather than derived from the program&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/geometric-action/"&gt;geometric action&lt;/a&gt;, and no machine check covers it.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The verdict: a conditional pass</title><link>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/conditional-pass/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/conditional-pass/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The verdict of &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/"&gt;the tuning test&lt;/a&gt; is a conditional pass. The potential that gives the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/momentum-graviton/"&gt;momentum graviton X&lt;/a&gt; its mass carries the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/fierz-pauli/"&gt;Boulware–Deser ghost&lt;/a&gt; when it is written in metric, or second-order, variables, and it is &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/ghosts/"&gt;ghost-free&lt;/a&gt; when it is written in frame, or first-order, variables. The condition is the choice of variables, and the &lt;a href="/wiki/history/documents/debt-1-notes/"&gt;calc notes&lt;/a&gt; argue that the first-order formulation is the natural one anyway, because the &lt;a href="/wiki/symmetry-breaking/order-parameter/"&gt;polarization J&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/frame-tier/"&gt;symplectic vielbein E&lt;/a&gt; are both first-order objects. Before the test, calc note #6 had spelled out what a failure would leave: only a phenomenological shell of &lt;a href="/wiki/dark-matter/conjugate-matter/velocity-gate/"&gt;gated&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="/wiki/dark-matter/halo-astrophysics/self-interacting-dark-matter/"&gt;self-interacting dark matter&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="/wiki/cosmology/dark-energy/tau-quintessence/"&gt;a dark-energy field on the Maslov circle&lt;/a&gt;, with the geometric story demoted to heuristics. &lt;a href="/wiki/history/documents/checkpoint/"&gt;Checkpoint #11&lt;/a&gt; tags the tuning test [D][V]. The machine checks cover the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/metric-tier-failures/"&gt;metric-tier failures&lt;/a&gt;; the frame-tier pass is a structural argument with no test, and its potential was selected rather than derived.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Constrained bimetric gravity</title><link>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/constrained-bimetric/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/constrained-bimetric/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Constrained bimetric gravity is the picture of the program&amp;rsquo;s gravity that &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/"&gt;the tuning test&lt;/a&gt; leaves. &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/hassan-rosen-bimetric/"&gt;Hassan–Rosen bimetric gravity&lt;/a&gt; is a &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/ghosts/"&gt;ghost-free&lt;/a&gt; theory of two interacting metrics, each with its own dynamics. In the program&amp;rsquo;s version the second frame is not a free field: it is the polarization frame, built from the &lt;a href="/wiki/symmetry-breaking/order-parameter/"&gt;polarization J&lt;/a&gt;, and J ranges only over the compact space &lt;a href="/wiki/phase-space/modular-field/lagrangian-grassmannian/"&gt;Λ(d)&lt;/a&gt; of splittings of phase space into position and momentum, which is ten-dimensional at d = 4. &lt;a href="/wiki/history/documents/debt-1-notes/"&gt;Calc note #7&lt;/a&gt; calls the result a predictive truncation of bimetric theory, with fewer free functions. In it the massless combination of the two spin-2 fields is the ordinary graviton, the massive one is the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/momentum-graviton/"&gt;momentum graviton X&lt;/a&gt;, and the light direction of the compact space is the &lt;a href="/wiki/phase-space/modular-field/maslov-phase/"&gt;dark-energy field τ&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="/wiki/phase-space/reciprocity/born-reciprocity/"&gt;Reciprocity&lt;/a&gt; then restricts the potential to its &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/palindromic-branch/"&gt;palindromic branch&lt;/a&gt;, and with the condition for a flat vacuum two free parameters remain. The picture is a structural derivation; the standard bimetric facts it uses come from the literature, and nothing in it is machine-checked.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The geometric action S_H and the v0.1 action (superseded)</title><link>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/geometric-action/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/geometric-action/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The v0.1 action is the complete action written in the program&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="/wiki/history/documents/lab-notebook/"&gt;lab notebook&lt;/a&gt; in September 2026: a sum of five terms, for the phase-space geometry, the &lt;a href="/wiki/phase-space/modular-field/maslov-phase/"&gt;dark-energy angle τ&lt;/a&gt;, the Standard Model, &lt;a href="/wiki/dark-matter/conjugate-matter/"&gt;conjugate matter&lt;/a&gt;, and an unspecified mixing term. Its geometric term S_H is an Einstein-like action for the phase-space metric H, built from the curvature of &lt;a href="/wiki/phase-space/born-geometry/born-connection/"&gt;the Born connection&lt;/a&gt; and written with both the &lt;a href="/wiki/phase-space/reciprocity/symplectic-form/"&gt;symplectic form&lt;/a&gt; ω and the &lt;a href="/wiki/phase-space/born-geometry/born-structures/"&gt;neutral metric η&lt;/a&gt; frozen, as &lt;a href="/wiki/program/postulates/original-p2/"&gt;the original P2&lt;/a&gt; required. From that rigidity the notebook argued that no second independent metric, and so no &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/fierz-pauli/"&gt;Boulware–Deser ghost&lt;/a&gt;, could arise. Both points were later overturned: &lt;a href="/wiki/program/postulates/p2-prime/"&gt;postulate P2′&lt;/a&gt; made η emergent, the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/momentum-graviton/"&gt;momentum graviton X&lt;/a&gt; was found to be a &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/momentum-graviton/dual-diffeomorphisms/"&gt;second graviton&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/ghosts/"&gt;ghost freedom&lt;/a&gt; now comes from &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/frame-tier/"&gt;the frame tier&lt;/a&gt;. This form of the action is therefore superseded, and &lt;a href="/wiki/history/documents/checkpoint/"&gt;checkpoint #11&lt;/a&gt; writes no full action. The name S_H survives as the action from which &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/wedge-reduction/"&gt;open problem 1&lt;/a&gt; asks for the ghost-free potential to be derived.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Open: deriving the wedge sector from S_H (OP1)</title><link>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/wedge-reduction/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/wedge-reduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This open problem asks for the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/spin-2-fields/ghosts/"&gt;ghost-free&lt;/a&gt; potential of the &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/momentum-graviton/"&gt;momentum graviton X&lt;/a&gt; to be derived from the program&amp;rsquo;s geometric action instead of being chosen. &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/"&gt;The tuning test&lt;/a&gt; found that wedge polynomials of the symplectic vielbein E and the polarization frame E₀[J] form a ghost-free class (&lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/frame-tier/"&gt;the frame tier&lt;/a&gt;), and argued that this is the minimal way to couple the polarization to the geometry. That argument selects the class; it does not obtain it line by line from an action. The only geometric action written out, the &lt;a href="/wiki/history/documents/lab-notebook/"&gt;lab notebook&lt;/a&gt;&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/tuning-test/geometric-action/"&gt;S_H&lt;/a&gt;, predates the change of postulate that brought X into the theory. The problem is item 1 of the open problems in &lt;a href="/wiki/history/documents/checkpoint/"&gt;checkpoint #11&lt;/a&gt; §14 [O], and one of the three items, with &lt;a href="/wiki/gravity/palindromic-branch/pm-comparison/"&gt;the partially-massless comparison&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="/wiki/phase-space/born-geometry/lorentzian-dressing/"&gt;the Lorentzian dressing&lt;/a&gt;, on which #11 makes the word &amp;ldquo;theory&amp;rdquo; wait. Nothing has been computed toward it, and it is not on the current work queue.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>